Please follow and like us:

“Conquest of Gravity”: a 1955 front page capturing the mid-century surge of anti-gravity research across major aerospace labs.

Figure: Front-page news in 1955 highlighted the “Conquest of Gravity” as the aim of top scientists, reflecting early optimism that mastering gravity could bring revolutionary changes “far beyond the atom” in power, transportation, and aviation[1]. In the 1950s, major aerospace companies (Convair, Lear, Sikorsky, General Dynamics, etc.) and leading physicists (including Edward Teller and J. Robert Oppenheimer) were already researching gravity control – exploring electromagnetism, spinning masses, and ways to reduce an object’s effective mass[2][3].

A Complete, Clear-Eyed Look at the Pros and Cons of Taming Gravity

Humanity has long dreamed of taming gravity – achieving artificial gravity or anti-gravity technology that can control the very force which binds the cosmos. From science fiction’s floating cars and starships to serious Pentagon research programs, the quest to manipulate gravity has captivated scientists and policymakers alike. Today, as we stand on the shoulders of Einstein’s breakthroughs in relativity, this dream is edging into the realm of scientific plausibility. Indeed, the concepts behind so-called “UFO propulsion” patents are grounded in over 60 years of peer-reviewed research by NASA, the Air Force, and academic labs[4]. Before we dive in, it’s important to explore why mastering gravity could be transformative – and also confront the potential downsides and dangers of this powerful capability. Below we present a comprehensive, in-depth look at the pros and cons of discovering how to create artificial gravity, drawing on historical efforts, modern theories, and futuristic visions of what gravity control might mean for our world.

The Enormous Upside: Why Mastering Gravity Could Revolutionize Civilization

Mastering gravity would be as game-changing for humanity as harnessing electricity or splitting the atom – perhaps even more so. The ability to generate, manipulate, or negate gravitational forces at will would open up unprecedented possibilities across transportation, space exploration, energy, and even social organization. Here are the major pros and promised benefits of gravity technology:

1. Revolutionizing Transportation and Logistics on Earth

Imagine a world where heavy cargo and everyday products can be lifted, moved, or propelled with equal ease regardless of their mass – where freight trains and container ships are obsolete because goods literally float from point to point. Artificial gravity could make that possible. In a gravitational field, all objects fall or accelerate at the same rate regardless of mass (as Galileo famously proved and Apollo astronauts demonstrated by dropping a hammer and feather on the Moon). This means if we can create a controlled gravity field or anti-gravity zone, a multi-ton shipping container could be accelerated and lifted just as easily as a small package. The cost and effort to transport heavy goods would plummet dramatically.

• Cutting Shipping Costs: By eliminating the constraints of weight, gravity tech could allow super-efficient freight movement. For example, instead of burning huge amounts of fuel to overcome weight (as trucks, trains, and planes do today), an anti-gravity device might neutralize most of an object’s weight, letting a small engine or even gravity itself do the work. Heavy machinery or infrastructure could be moved with minimal energy, potentially transforming industries like construction, mining, and global trade.
• Hover Vehicles & Safer Travel: On the consumer level, gravity control would enable hover-cars, floating trains, and personal flying vehicles that don’t require traditional engines or wheels. A vehicle that cancels its gravity could hover frictionlessly and be guided by a slight push or a gentle field. In fact, researchers in the 1990s who pursued “gravity shielding” envisioned that a simple disc device might make a bowling ball hover in mid-air[5]. With such technology, roads, rails, and even runways might become obsolete – vehicles could travel point-to-point through the air, reducing travel time and accidents (no more crashes due to gravity pulling you down).
• Drastically Reduced Energy Use: Perhaps most importantly, taming gravity could end our reliance on fossil fuels for transport. If gravity can do the work of propulsion (for instance, by creating a downhill gravitational slope in the direction you want to go), then ships, planes, and trucks would need only minimal onboard power[6]. An object could be made effectively weightless or even given a “negative weight” (anti-gravity lifting it upward), so a small electric motor or even ambient forces could move it. Transportation powered by gravity control would consume far less energy than rocketry or combustion engines, potentially making global logistics much cleaner and cheaper. As a 2023 retrospective noted, taming gravity would drastically change the way we transport on every level – humans could travel the world with ease, we could have the hoverboards from Back to the Future, and powering transportation would be transformed, ending dependence on fossil fuels[6]. In short, gravity tech could usher in an era of green transportation, slashing carbon emissions and environmental impact.
• Infrastructure and Construction: The ability to cancel or create gravity on demand would also revolutionize how we build things. Heavy components of buildings, bridges, or spacecraft could be lifted effortlessly into place. We might construct super-tall skyscrapers or even floating structures that today would collapse under their own weight. Gravity cranes could lift entire ships or buildings. The daunting cost and danger of large engineering projects would drop, since materials could be moved like weightless foam. This could accelerate development in poorer regions (where lack of heavy equipment limits infrastructure) and enable architectural marvels currently impossible under normal gravity.

Overall, artificial gravity control promises a transportation revolution on Earth. Much as electricity and internal combustion shrank the world in the 20th century, gravity tech in the 21st could make moving people and goods virtually effortless. Shipping costs approaching zero would reshape the global economy – distance and weight would no longer constrain trade or travel. Every corner of the planet could become accessible with minimal cost and time, fundamentally altering our relationship with geography. It’s not an exaggeration to say gravity control could do for transport what the internet did for information: remove the friction of distance, leading to an explosion of connectivity and opportunity.

2. Enabling Interplanetary & Interstellar Travel – The Key to the Cosmos

Perhaps the most exciting pro of mastering gravity is how it would open the heavens to us. Interplanetary and interstellar travel – routine voyages to Mars or even distant stars – could become achievable in practical timeframes once we learn to bend gravity to our will. Artificial gravity technology addresses two of the biggest challenges in space travel: propulsion and life support. Let’s break these down:

• Fast Propulsion without Fuel: Our current rockets are painfully slow and inefficient for traveling beyond the Moon – they rely on carrying tons of propellant and provide only brief acceleration. Gravity control could change that via continuous, fuel-free acceleration. If a spacecraft can generate a directional gravity field (or a propelled anti-gravity effect), it can literally “fall” through space toward its destination. Imagine creating a controllable gravitational pull in front of a starship – the ship would constantly be pulled forward, “falling” toward that point, then the point itself can be moved further ahead like a carrot on a stick. This concept has been suggested by forward-thinking physicists: for instance, using an artificial micro-black-hole generated ahead of a ship to tug it along at ever-increasing speeds, while the ship stays safely outside the black hole’s event horizon. As the ship is pulled forward by this moving gravity well, space in front of the craft would contract and space behind it would expand – essentially the spacecraft surfs a self-generated warp in spacetime without ever entering an unsafe region[7][8]. Such a method could, in theory, accelerate a vehicle to unprecedented speeds, potentially even exceeding light-speed relative to distant observers by warping space (more on the physics of that below).

• It sounds incredible, but it’s not pure fiction. The well-known Alcubierre warp drive concept in general relativity allows faster-than-light travel by contracting space ahead of a ship and expanding it behind. Traditionally this needs “exotic” negative energy, and a protective bubble around the ship. Our gravity-control approach is a twist: instead of enveloping the ship in a warp bubble (which has serious issues, as we’ll note later), we create a localized gravity mass ahead of the ship that continuously pulls it and warps space. Dr. Jack Sarfatti, a theoretical physicist, argues that advanced metamaterials can achieve exactly this – generating a low-power warp field that “shrinks space in front of [a craft] and stretches it behind, letting it move faster or hover without traditional engines”[9]. In Sarfatti’s model, metamaterial surfaces on a craft can be tuned to emit controlled gravitational fields – either attractive (to compress space and pull the craft) or repulsive (to expand space or provide lift)[10]. This could mimic the Alcubierre drive effect but from the craft’s hull itself, using only electromagnetic energy and clever materials. The reported flight characteristics of the famous “Tic Tac” UFO (observed by US Navy pilots in 2004) – instantaneous accelerations, right-angle turns, hovering with no visible thrusters – match what a metamaterial gravity-engine could do[11][12]. In other words, artificial gravity propulsion might already exist in experimental form, demonstrating extreme performance that breaks the limits of ordinary aerodynamics and rocketry. If developed openly, this technology would allow us to send missions to Mars in days or weeks instead of months, and perhaps reach nearby star systems within years instead of millennia.

• Continuous 1g Acceleration: Even if faster-than-light warp remained out of reach, gravity control would enable continuous acceleration at 1g (Earth’s gravity) or higher, which could dramatically shorten travel times in the solar system. At 1g acceleration, a spacecraft could reach Mars in as little as a couple of days (accelerating halfway, then decelerating) instead of ~7 months. The crew would also experience Earth-like gravity the entire trip, maintaining their health and comfort. Artificial gravity for crew is itself a huge benefit – prolonged weightlessness causes muscle atrophy, bone loss, and other health issues for astronauts. Today, NASA designs rotating habitats or exercise regimes to mitigate zero-g effects on long voyages. But if we can generate gravity onboard (either by accelerating the ship or via a gravity generator device), astronauts can live and work in normal gravity conditions. This makes multi-year journeys or even permanent space habitation much more feasible. Essentially, artificial gravity = artificial habitat gravity, turning a spaceship into a livable environment like Earth. This is critical if we ever send people to Jupiter’s moons or attempt crewed interstellar travel.
• Interstellar Community & “Meeting the Neighbors”: The philosophical and societal impact of gravity-enabled star travel could be immense. We could “join the interstellar community” of advanced civilizations, if any are out there, much sooner than by waiting for slower-than-light probes. The user’s point about “once you get up to your Albert Einstein, it’s time to grow up and meet the neighbors” speaks to this idea – that mastering relativity and gravity is a right of passage for a civilization to become interstellar. If there are other civilizations who have already tamed gravity, reaching their level could allow contact and exchange of knowledge. This is both an inspiration and a practical benefit: such contact might help us solve problems on Earth by learning how older civilizations overcame challenges like war, scarcity, or planetary crises. There is a hopeful notion that any society capable of star travel has learned to live peacefully and sustainably, otherwise they’d likely self-destruct before reaching that stage. By joining their ranks, humanity could gain a “galactic perspective” that transcends the artificial boundaries (countries, rival factions) and zero-sum thinking that plague our world. In science fiction, meeting advanced aliens often unites humanity (a common enemy or a common goal). In reality, the mere knowledge that interstellar travel – and perhaps other hospitable worlds – are within reach can broaden our horizons and reduce parochial conflicts. The famous anecdote of an extraterrestrial being telling Colonel Philip Corso “A new world… if you can take it”[7] resonates here: gravity control literally offers us new worlds, both figuratively (new paradigms of science) and literally (new planets to explore or colonize) – but only if we have the wisdom and courage to embrace it.
• Resource Abundance and Planetary Protection: With easy interplanetary travel, we could tap the virtually unlimited resources of space – mining asteroids for metals and water, tapping solar energy in space, and perhaps even terraforming other planets. This could usher in a post-scarcity era where competition over Earth’s finite resources (oil, minerals, land) is obsolete. Many of our global conflicts and inequities stem from resource scarcity or unequal access. If gravity tech lets us cheaply haul gigatons of asteroid ore or beam abundant clean energy to Earth, the pressure that drives wars and poverty could diminish. Every person on Earth could theoretically have a much higher standard of living without harming the planet, because we’d have off-world sources of materials and energy. Simultaneously, being able to move heavy payloads off Earth easily means we could re-locate dirty industries to space, mine the Moon instead of polluting Earth, and even divert dangerous asteroids with gravity tractors (thus protecting the biosphere). In short, gravity control might be the key to making humanity a multi-planet species and ensuring long-term survival of our civilization. We could expand outward, reducing the odds that a single planet’s catastrophe (be it nuclear war or environmental collapse) ends human civilization. This is a profound pro – some argue that developing spaceflight technology is existential insurance for humanity. Artificial gravity propulsion would accelerate that development rapidly.
• Global Collaboration and Innovation: Achieving something as ambitious as control of gravity likely requires the talents and efforts of all humanity. One could argue that the very attempt would be a unifying project on the scale of the Moon landing or larger. The user notes that it “takes the entire world population to get anything done” and that “we make a better product the more people work on it.” In a sense, a crash program to crack gravity could function like a Global Apollo Project, inspiring nations to cooperate rather than compete. Already, in the scientific community, gravity research has quietly involved international teams and cross-border collaboration (for example, research into gravitomagnetism, warp field physics, and advanced propulsion often brings together academics from many countries). If governments decided to openly pursue gravity control for civilian benefits, one hopes it would be done transparently and inclusively, perhaps through international collaborations (similar to how CERN or the International Space Station operate). This could strengthen global ties and redirect military expenditures into a shared scientific endeavor. Moreover, with modern tools like AI (artificial intelligence can help sift data and design experiments), the pace of innovation could be exponential. The user’s point that AI plus global human collaboration means the “ability to make the best products should be available to everyone” suggests that once gravity tech is unlocked, its benefits can rapidly spread worldwide – if we choose an open, shared approach. The pro here is a bit idealistic: that pursuing and sharing gravity technology could help unify humanity around a positive goal, shifting us away from destructive rivalries.

In summary, the upsides of taming gravity are astonishing and far-reaching. We could see a transportation revolution on Earth, a new era of space exploration and colonization, an end to material scarcity and fossil-fuel dependency, and perhaps even a boost in global peace and cooperation. We would effectively graduate to a new level of civilization – one capable of transcending gravity, our planet’s confines, and maybe even the light-speed barrier. The potential is so great that it has been described as “a new world” on offer to humanity[7]. Little wonder that optimists say we must pursue this breakthrough as soon as possible – the sooner we harness gravity, the sooner we unlock humanity’s next stage of progress. As aerospace engineer Grover Loening predicted after decades of experience, “I firmly believe that before long man will acquire the ability to build an electromagnetic contra-gravity mechanism that works… Much the same line of reasoning that enabled scientists to split the atom will enable them to learn the nature of gravitational attraction and ways to counter it.”[13]. And back in 1956, George S. Trimble (a leader at Martin Aircraft) stated that if sufficient resources and brainpower were devoted, “we could do the job [of conquering gravity] in about the time it took to build the first atom bomb”[14] – a bold claim, hinting that with focus and will, gravity control is an achievable near-future goal, not a far-off fantasy.

The Science Behind Artificial Gravity: From Theory to Experiment

To appreciate both the promise and pitfalls of gravity control, it’s important to understand how scientists think it might be done. Gravity is famously the most enigmatic of nature’s forces – Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity showed that gravity isn’t a traditional force at all, but rather a curvature of spacetime caused by mass-energy. In simple terms, mass (and energy) tell spacetime how to curve, and curved spacetime tells objects how to move. This makes gravity tricky to manipulate: unlike electromagnetism, we can’t just generate a new gravity field with a wire and a battery. There’s no known “anti-mass” equivalent to positive mass that we can plug in to reverse gravity (negative mass would, in theory, produce repulsive gravity, but it hasn’t been observed in nature).

However, physics does allow for some loopholes and phenomena that could be harnessed to simulate anti-gravity or create gravitational fields artificially. Let’s survey the key scientific ideas and efforts that underpin the dream of taming gravity:

• Gravitomagnetism and Frame-Dragging: In relativity, moving masses and rotating masses create subtle “gravitomagnetic” effects analogous to how moving electric charges create magnetic fields. For example, Earth’s rotation slightly drags spacetime around with it (an effect confirmed by NASA’s Gravity Probe B experiment). These effects are normally extremely weak – but if we could amplify them, we might generate usable gravity-like fields. In the 1990s, Dr. Ning Li (a Chinese-American physicist at University of Alabama-Huntsville) and her colleague Douglas Torr developed a theory that a spinning superconductor could align billions of atomic-scale gravitomagnetic effects to produce a significant anti-gravity force[15]. Specifically, Li proposed that ions in a lattice, if all rotating in phase (possibly achieved with a Bose-Einstein condensate in a superconducting disc), would create a coherent gravitomagnetic field perpendicular to the disc – effectively neutralizing or repelling gravity above the disc[16]. In principle, it could reduce the weight of objects above it. Li claimed that about 1 kilowatt of power input could produce a gravity-nullifying field in a region about one foot above a 12-inch superconducting disc[17][5]. She and Torr even told Popular Mechanics that upon completion of their prototype disc, “a bowling ball placed anywhere above this disc will stay exactly where you left it”[5] – essentially levitating in defiance of gravity. This bold claim drew wide press coverage in the mid-90s. It was inspired in part by earlier experiments of Russian scientist Eugene Podkletnov, who reported small weight losses (around 2%) for objects above a rapidly rotating superconducting disk. While Podkletnov’s results were controversial and not reliably replicated, Ning Li’s research garnered enough interest that the U.S. Department of Defense provided a $448,000 grant in 2001 for her to continue the work under a company she founded called AC Gravity, LLC[18]. The idea was to create measurable AC gravity fields (alternating or oscillating gravity) and explore their propulsion possibilities. It’s worth noting that Li’s approach was a genuine attempt at scientific anti-gravity, grounded in general relativity and condensed matter physics, not sci-fi handwaving. If successful, it would directly address the transportation benefits we discussed (e.g. making objects effectively lighter or weightless on demand).
• Mysterious Results and Secrecy: What became of Ning Li’s work is itself an intriguing story. After 2001, Li went quiet – no public results were ever published from her DoD-funded research, and she ceased communicating with the civilian science community[18][19]. Rumors spread that her work went “black” (classified). In 2003 she did appear at a closed conference to discuss measuring AC gravity, alongside Army officials[20], suggesting the research was ongoing at least through that time. According to a 2023 investigative article, Li continued anti-gravity research at Redstone Arsenal as a top-secret cleared scientist for years, until an injury in 2014 ended her career[21][22]. Her son later confirmed that after receiving her security clearance, she stopped sharing anything – “she wasn’t allowed to share with anyone…she became much quieter”[23][24]. FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) requests for her research were denied, so whatever she found (if anything) remains hidden[25]. Some feared she defected to China, but in reality she stayed in the U.S. until her death in 2021[26]. The Ning Li saga underscores a major theme in gravity research: much of it has been absorbed into military programs and shielded from public view. This means progress could be happening behind closed doors that we don’t know about – a double-edged sword, as we discuss later. It also shows that early laboratory efforts did hint at anomalous effects (Podkletnov’s and Li’s claims) that merited serious investigation. While no conclusive, peer-verified “anti-gravity device” has been announced publicly, these experiments keep interest alive. Even NASA’s Institute for Advanced Concepts (NIAC) quietly monitored such research, and theoretical studies by the Air Force have pointed out that approaches like Dr. James Woodward’s “Mach-effect” mass fluctuation experiments are among the “most promising” for breakthrough propulsion[27]. (Woodward’s devices use electric pulses in piezoelectric materials to induce tiny oscillations in inertial mass, which over many cycles could produce net thrust – he has observed very small effects in the lab, and papers suggest with certain materials and higher power, much larger mass reductions might be achieved[28][29].) The bottom line: credible scientists have proposed real physics-based methods to manipulate gravity, and some experimental results, while controversial, suggest it’s not pure fantasy. However, reproducible, scalable technology has yet to be openly demonstrated.
• Warp Drive Physics and Metamaterials: On a more theoretical front, the idea of spacetime “warp drives” has moved from science fiction to serious (if speculative) physics literature in the past few decades. Miguel Alcubierre’s 1994 paper showed that general relativity permits a solution that effectively allows superluminal travel – the catch is it requires a shell of negative energy density (often imagined as exotic matter) to sustain the warp bubble. Generating that in reality is profoundly difficult. But modern physicists have been re-examining these requirements. Interestingly, Dr. Jack Sarfatti and others have suggested that cleverly engineered metamaterials might simulate the effects of the required negative energy by exploiting quantum vacuum phenomena. Sarfatti’s approach, as mentioned, involves a craft’s hull made of “space-time metamaterials” pumped with high-frequency electromagnetic fields[12]. By driving these materials out of equilibrium, they could form what’s called a Fröhlich condensate (a room-temperature macroscopic quantum state) that behaves a bit like a superconducting medium for gravitational fields[30][31]. In this state, each “meta-atom” in the material can, according to Sarfatti’s theory, be toggled to create either a local attractive gravity well (a redshift) or a repulsive gravity hill (a blueshift)[10]. By coordinating billions of these microscopic generators, the craft can produce a tailored warp field – shrinking space ahead, expanding space behind, in the same fashion as the Alcubierre drive, but without needing planet-sized energy. Essentially, the negative energy requirement is mimicked by phase delays and quantum effects in the material, which create an effective negative mass condition in a controlled region[32][33]. This is highly theoretical, but fits observed data: for example, the Navy pilots who chased the Tic Tac UFO noted it seemed to “drop” from 80,000 feet to sea level in a blink – an acceleration that no traditional craft could survive. If the Tic Tac had a warp-metamaterial hull, it could be locally canceling inertia and gravity, so that it and its occupants feel no G-forces while making that extreme maneuver[34][35]. Sarfatti’s model even invokes advanced quantum ideas like Valentini’s sub-quantum non equilibrium and pilot-wave theory, hinting that these craft operate in a domain where they can sidestep normal physics limits (like a kind of controlled quantum loophole)[36][37]. The key takeaway isn’t the details, but that serious physicists are actively figuring out how to engineer warp fields and gravitational manipulation with plausible materials. This is no longer just fantasy – papers, conferences (like the Alternative Propulsion Engineering Conference in 2021), and even aerospace company interest (Lockheed’s Skunk Works famously hinted at such things) show that the science of “metric engineering” (shaping spacetime) is being fleshed out. If any of these approaches pan out, we might achieve fast interstellar travel and advanced propulsion without waiting for entirely new physics.
• Black Budget Projects and Patents: Another indicator that gravity tech is taken seriously are the patents and programs emerging from military circles. In recent years, the U.S. Navy attracted attention by filing a series of patents for exotic technologies – one for a “Craft using an inertial mass reduction device” (essentially an anti-gravity spacecraft), another for a high-frequency gravitational wave generator, and even a room-temperature superconductor. These were invented by Dr. Salvatore Pais, a Naval Aerospace Engineer. While many scientists are skeptical of the patents (they read like theoretical concepts that haven’t been built), the Navy felt confident enough to secure patents, even attesting that prototypes were tested. In one patent, Pais describes a triangle-shaped craft with inner resonant cavity walls that, when energized with electromagnetic waves, reduce its inertial and gravitational mass (perhaps via creating a local vacuum energy state) – allowing it to move at extreme speeds with minimal resistance[38][39]. The patent diagrams essentially show a triangle UFO (remarkably similar to many “black triangle” UFO reports) – which suggests the Navy or its contractors have at least conceptual designs for such vehicles (see Figure 2 below). Notably, internal Navy emails (obtained via FOIA) revealed that these patents were pushed through by Naval officials claiming that China was already working on similar technology[40]. Whether that’s true or a bureaucratic strategy, it underlines that major powers are indeed researching gravity control. Furthermore, as reported by The War Zone, these Pais inventions did not come out of nowhere – they draw upon decades of prior research (much of it published in unclassified literature by NASA, AIAA, etc.)[41]. In fact, the U.S. military has formally pursued anti-gravity and “propellantless” propulsion since the 1950s[42]. Many aerospace giants (Boeing, Lockheed, Martin, etc.) had gravity research labs or projects in that era[43][44], and although none announced a breakthrough, it appears efforts quietly continued under more secretive arrangements. Ben Rich, the legendary director of Lockheed Skunk Works, hinted in 1994, “We have some new things… some of them 20 or 30 years old, that are still breakthroughs and appropriate to keep quiet about because other people don’t have them yet.”[45] This cryptic statement has fueled speculation that black-budget programs may have already achieved some level of gravity control or advanced propulsion, but are withholding it for strategic/military advantage. While we can’t know for sure, the accumulation of evidence – anomalous craft sightings, patents, longstanding classified R&D – suggests that the science of artificial gravity is maturing. It’s not a question of if so much as when and who will unveil workable technology first. Will it emerge from a shadowy defense lab, or from open civilian science? That choice has huge implications, bridging us to the next section: the potential downsides if we handle this wrong.

Figure 2: Diagram from a 2018 U.S. Navy patent for a “craft using an inertial mass reduction device,” essentially an anti-gravity propulsion craft. The design involves a triangular hull (10) with internal resonant cavities (50, 55) energized by microwaves, creating high-frequency electromagnetic fields that reduce the craft’s gravitational and inertial mass[38]. Navy documents claim this allows “engineered” control of the gravitational force[46]. While it’s unclear if this craft has been built, the patent aligns with theories of using electromagnetic resonance to warp spacetime or create lift. Military interest in such devices is longstanding – these concepts are built on over 60 years of gravity research by NASA, Air Force labs, and others[41].

The Downside: Risks and Cons of Artificial Gravity Technology

As with any powerful technology, the ability to control gravity comes with significant risks, challenges, and potential negative consequences. It’s not all starships and utopia – there are very real reasons to be cautious or even alarmed about what humanity might do with gravity tech, especially if handled irresponsibly or monopolized by a few. Here are the major cons and concerns surrounding the advent of artificial gravity:

1. Weaponization and Military Misuse of Gravity

If history is any guide, virtually every major scientific breakthrough – from explosives to nuclear energy to computing – has been seized upon for military use. Gravity control would be no exception. In fact, the intense secrecy and defense funding around gravity research (as seen with Ning Li’s DoD project and the Navy patents) suggest the first uses of gravity tech may well be weapons or military systems. This is deeply concerning for several reasons:

• Gravity Bombs and Mass-Destruction Weapons: A device that can create or alter gravity fields could be turned into a horrific weapon. For example, a “gravity bomb” might work by drastically increasing gravity in a target area for a brief moment – everything within could be slammed with several times normal gravity. Imagine an enemy base suddenly experiencing 10g gravity: people would be crushed to the floor, equipment would collapse under its own weight, structures might implode. Conversely, a sudden removal of gravity (0g) could be just as destructive – if a building’s weight-bearing structure loses weight, it might spring upward and then violently oscillate when gravity returns, causing collapse. A more sci-fi scenario: creating a micro-black-hole weapon. A contained artificial micro black hole, if somehow directed at a target, could literally swallow matter or trigger earthquakes (by distorting local geology) before evaporating. These kinds of weapons could wreak mass destruction without any fallout or chemical residue, making them frightening prospects. They could also potentially bypass conventional defenses – no wall or armor can shield against gravity itself. While this level of technology is speculative, it’s theoretically possible if gravity manipulation is mastered. We already worry about nuclear winter; a deliberate gravitational catastrophe (like destabilizing a portion of a planet’s crust) could be another doomsday scenario.
• Induced Disasters: Even without malicious intent, a gravity device misused could unintentionally cause disasters. For instance, using powerful gravity fields in the atmosphere or underground could trigger earthquakes or tsunamis. The user specifically noted this concern – an irresponsible use of gravity tech “causing earthquakes [or] squashing things.” If a gravity generator pulled upward on the Earth’s crust or lowered gravity locally, it might create stress imbalances along fault lines. It’s conceivable that an adversary might try to trigger earthquakes in enemy territory (a concept sometimes dubbed a “tectonic weapon”). Similarly, drastically altering gravity in an area could disrupt the atmosphere – e.g., cause sudden violent updrafts or downdrafts, essentially messing with weather patterns or even stripping air away if used in the upper atmosphere. These environmental weapons could have global effects, akin to how nuclear explosions can cause climate effects. Unlike nukes, gravity weapons might be less obvious to attribute, which is dangerous for strategic stability (a country could be attacked in this way and not immediately know who did it or even that it was a deliberate attack).
• Space Warfare and Kinetic Impacts: Gravity control would also militarize space in new ways. With easy access to orbit via anti-gravity, nations (or rogue actors) could place huge masses in space and drop them on targets – a concept known as “rods from God” (tungsten rods de-orbited as kinetic projectiles) becomes far easier if lifting those rods to orbit is cheap. Even without exotic weapons, gravity tech would enable rapid deployment of forces anywhere on Earth, or extremely fast missiles/drones that can accelerate at g-forces no human pilot could survive (because the gravity tech could nullify inertia for the payload). A country with advanced gravity vehicles could dominate militarily, rendering current armies and air forces obsolete. This might spur a dangerous arms race as others rush to catch up. The prospect of one nation or group monopolizing gravity control is pretty scary – it would be like one side having nuclear weapons when the rest do not, but perhaps even more extreme, since gravity tech could have both subtle and catastrophic uses.
• Inertia Dampening = Relativistic Weapons: A gravity propulsion system inherently also grants the ability to dampen inertia (since you don’t want your pilots to be crushed during high-g maneuvers). In the wrong hands, this means you could accelerate a vehicle or mass to extremely high velocity (even relativistic speeds) and not worry about G-forces. Essentially, you could create relativistic kill vehicles – projectiles moving at a significant fraction of light speed. Just a few kilograms of matter traveling near light-speed can hit with the energy of a nuclear bomb, without any nuclear material. If gravity tech allows an object to free-fall-accelerate continuously (like falling toward an artificial black hole) to near-light speeds, then releasing that object or aiming it at a target could produce unparalleled destruction. Such a weapon could theoretically strike anywhere on Earth from space with almost no warning (since at 0.5c it would cross the globe in a fraction of a second). This is an extreme scenario, but it illustrates how taming gravity might introduce military capabilities far beyond today’s arsenals. It could completely destabilize global security if not internationally controlled.

In summary, the weaponization risk of artificial gravity is perhaps the greatest con of all. A technology that could save the world could also, in the wrong hands, destroy it. This is why some argue gravity research has been kept secret – militaries fear the implications of everyone having it. Yet that secrecy itself breeds dangerous imbalance (as we’ll discuss below). Humanity will need to establish strong international agreements and norms if gravity tech becomes real, akin to (but likely more complex than) our treaties on nuclear weapons. Otherwise, we could leap into a new arms race that makes the Cold War nuclear standoff look mild. The user rightly points out that our current paradigm of “haves and have-nots” and scarcity-driven conflict cannot continue if we expect to survive the introduction of such powerful tech. It’s sobering that the stakes are so high: either we mature and cooperate (sharing the benefits of gravity tech), or we risk annihilation by using it against each other.

2. Accidents, Unintended Consequences, and Physical Dangers

Even outside of warfare, artificial gravity technology could pose serious hazards if something goes wrong. We are, after all, talking about manipulating the fabric of spacetime or creating novel gravitational conditions – things we have never done before on a large scale. Here are some potential dangers and cons on the technical side:

• Warp Drive Radiation Hazard: Earlier we discussed warp drive concepts as a pro for fast travel, but there’s a flip side: theoretical analyses have shown that a warp bubble could be extremely dangerous to its occupants and surroundings. A particularly important 2010 paper (by Finazzi et al.) found that if a ship ever did go superluminal using an Alcubierre-like drive, it would develop a “black hole horizon” behind it and a “white hole horizon” in front of it – essentially trapping light. This would lead to intense Hawking radiation (the same kind of radiation black holes emit) flooding the bubble[47]. The calculation suggested the temperature inside the bubble would soar high enough to “kill astronauts” and perhaps vaporize the ship[48]. Even worse, the warp bubble geometry appeared unstable, with energy piling up at the front end without limit – meaning the drive could catastrophically collapse as soon as it started moving at FTL speeds[49]. In short, the “Alcubierre drive” in its naive form would roast its passengers and self-destruct[50]. This is a big con: certain approaches to gravity propulsion might have built-in physical roadblocks or deadly side effects. Any attempt to engineer a warp or gravity drive must contend with these issues – perhaps Sarfatti’s metamaterials mitigate them by operating at subluminal speeds or in bursts, but the risk might still be there if pushing the envelope. We wouldn’t want to build a ship only to find its mode of travel is a death trap or that it spews harmful radiation in its wake (imagine every time a craft jumped to warp, it fried electronics or living things nearby).
• Containment Failures: If our gravity tech involves creating exotic conditions (like a controlled singularity, high-energy fields, or extreme rotation), failures could be catastrophic. For example, if you generate a micro black hole for propulsion, you absolutely must contain it. Stephen Hawking’s theory says micro black holes evaporate quickly via radiation, but if our understanding is off and one survives longer, an uncontrolled black hole could literally fall to Earth’s center, consuming matter (albeit likely slowly) – a sci-fi nightmare scenario. Even a less exotic gravity generator – say a superconducting spinning disk – could have issues: if it somehow created a sudden gravity surge or loss, nearby objects could be flung violently. The mechanical stress on devices producing artificial gravity might be enormous. A slight mis-calibration could possibly produce a localized gravity gradient that tears the device apart (gravity fields can induce tidal forces). Think about the LHC (Large Hadron Collider): before it turned on, some people worried it might create a micro black hole; physicists calculated it was safe. With gravity engineering, we will need similar caution and rigorous analysis to ensure we’re not accidentally creating a phenomenon we can’t control or that has irreversible effects. Until the tech is mature, the risk of accidents could slow deployment – for instance, no aviation authority would allow civilian anti-grav vehicles if there’s a chance one could inadvertently cause an “antigravity explosion” that sends cars floating into the sky or a “gravity surge” that punches a crater in the ground. We will likely need slow, careful testing to avoid tragic accidents that could set the field back and cost lives.
• Environmental and Health Effects: Gravity fields might have subtle effects on living organisms and the environment we don’t yet know. Prolonged exposure to altered gravity (higher, lower, or directional fields) could impact human physiology in unexpected ways – we know long-term zero-g is harmful, but what about long-term 2g or weird field gradients? Could artificial gravity fields at high power cause electromagnetic interference or radiation byproducts? Some gravity theories involve high-frequency gravitational waves – could those, if powerful, damage cells or DNA? It’s largely speculative, but whenever we introduce new fields (like when we introduced strong radio/microwave sources), there are initially unknown health effects that need study (for example, high-power radar was later found to be a hazard for those too close). We would need to ensure that gravity engines don’t, say, cause nausea, disorientation, or worse in people nearby (imagine a gravity generator that inadvertently distorts inner-ear function or blood flow). On an environmental scale, if huge masses are moved around or floating, we should consider atmospheric effects – a large anti-grav freighter might produce shockwaves or turbulence. Moreover, if gravity modification interacted with Earth’s own field, could localized use slightly alter Earth’s rotation or orbit over long periods? (This seems far-fetched unless massive scale, but worth monitoring). Basically, messing with fundamental forces might have butterfly effects that are hard to predict without real-world data, so early introduction comes with uncertainty.
• Uncontrolled Proliferation: A more societal unintended consequence is if gravity tech, once discovered, becomes impossible to contain or regulate. Unlike nuclear material which requires rare fuels, a gravity device might be built in a garage if someone leaks the principles (imagine something as simple as a special superconducting disk or metamaterial – once the know-how is public, many could replicate it). This democratization is good in one sense (no single tyrant can hog it), but also scary: bad actors could get hold of it. You wouldn’t want terrorist groups or criminal enterprises able to build a gravity-bomb or float past security perimeters. With great power comes great responsibility, and also the challenge of keeping it out of the wrong hands. This con is somewhat speculative – we don’t know how hard it will be to build gravity tech; it might require large facilities (in which case control is easier) or maybe just clever engineering (in which case it could spread widely).

3. Social, Economic, and Political Disruption

Even if we avoid war and accidents, the transition to a gravity-tech society could be very disruptive. The user points out that any transition we have to go through for this to happen will be much smaller than what we will go through if we don’t – implying it’s worth it despite the pain. That may be true, but we should still acknowledge some cons related to the upheaval gravity control could bring:

• Economic Upheaval: Entire industries would be upended. Think of the millions of jobs in transportation – drivers, pilots, ship crews, railway workers – not to mention automobile manufacturing, oil drilling, road construction. If anti-gravity freighters and flying cars come to market, these traditional sectors could collapse rapidly. While society will eventually adjust with new industries (gravity-engine manufacturing, anti-grav vehicle operations, etc.), there could be a period of significant unemployment and economic displacement. Companies not quick to adapt (say, an airline that doesn’t invest in gravity vehicles) might go bankrupt. Regions dependent on old tech (oil-producing regions, highway motel towns) could suffer. Historically, such transitions (Industrial Revolution, automation, etc.) cause social strife – e.g. protests, possibly violence – before new opportunities create new jobs. We’d need proactive measures (job retraining programs, economic policies) to mitigate this.
• Inequality and Power Dynamics: If gravity tech is initially expensive or limited, it could worsen inequality. Wealthy individuals or rich countries might access it first, gaining even more advantage (think of rich communities with gravity vehicles bypassing traffic while the poor are stuck on the ground). If only one or a few nations have gravity-propelled spacecraft, they could essentially dominate space resources and even enforce a kind of global hegemony (owning the high ground of space militarily and economically). This is why many argue gravity tech must be shared openly; if it stays a military secret of one nation, that nation could become an overwhelming superpower, and that imbalance could lead to conflict (others might resort to espionage or war to get the tech themselves). The user specifically said these technologies should be “taken out of the military-industrial black budget arena and given to the entire world of humanity”, to prevent such scenarios. The con of not doing so is a worsening of global tensions, essentially a gravity-tech Cold War. On a smaller scale, even within societies, access to gravity-enhanced life (easy travel, energy, etc.) could create a class divide if not managed – we’d need policies to ensure broad access, much like internet access was broadened.
• Loss of Traditional Boundaries: If everyone (or at least many people) eventually has access to personal flying vehicles that can cross any border in minutes, how do nations maintain border control? The concept of countries with strict borders might erode when gravity vehicles can bypass terrestrial checkpoints by literally going over or under them through 3D space. This could be positive (less isolation) but also threatens current political structures. Countries might need to cooperate much more on security because unilateral border enforcement becomes impractical. Some “artificial boundaries” (as the user calls them) like countries might become more porous or even irrelevant in the face of a truly global (and beyond) transportation network. Culturally, this could be disruptive – some populations might resist the loss of traditional separations or the influx of global movement. It’s akin to how the internet made information borderless, often to the chagrin of regimes that want control. Gravity tech could make physical movement borderless. We’d have to rethink concepts of airspace, sovereignty, and migration in a world where moving to another continent is as easy as a short “gravity hop.” That could cause political tension or require new global governance agreements.
• Ethical Considerations: There are also ethical questions. If we can reach other planets with life (even simple life), do we have the right to exploit those resources or alter those environments? How do we ensure we don’t become the invading “neighbors” to someone else, imposing our will? And on Earth, if gravity tech can produce essentially free energy (some proposals suggest using gravity control to extract energy from cosmic phenomena or oscillate mass for power), we have to decide how to distribute that fairly. We saw with nuclear energy that it brought both bombs and power plants – society had to scramble to create safeguards like non-proliferation treaties and waste management. Gravity tech might require new ethical frameworks about its use (e.g., perhaps an international ban on gravity weapons, akin to bioweapons bans, would be needed; or agreements that space belongs to all, to prevent gravity-driven land grabs on the Moon or asteroids). The transition period where we figure out these rules could be dangerous if mismanaged.
• Psychological and Cultural Shock: When the world changes too quickly, people can experience shock and backlash. If gravity control comes to fruition, the changes – flying cars, human colonies on Mars, meeting aliens, etc. – could be extremely rapid and profound. Some people may react with fear, denial, or aggression. There could be cultural/religious resistance (similar to how some reacted to theories like evolution or heliocentrism) if, say, we meet extraterrestrial neighbors or if post-scarcity economics overturn traditional values about work and reward. Society will need to adapt its mindset – possibly embracing a more unified identity as “Earthlings” once we’re moving freely off-world. This is a positive evolution, but the process could be bumpy. The user alludes to “once a planet gets to their Einstein, it is time to grow up” – meaning we as a society have to mature. That includes shedding toxic ideologies (like scarcity-driven greed or zero-sum nationalism) and adopting new ones (perhaps a focus on stewardship, cooperation, and curiosity). The con is, if we fail to grow up in time, we might misuse the technology or let old prejudices cause new conflicts. Essentially, our social maturity may lag behind our technical prowess, which is a recipe for trouble. The hope is that striving for and achieving gravity tech could itself be a catalyst for that maturity – but it’s not guaranteed.

4. The Cost of Secrecy and Delay

A final “con” to consider is what happens if we don’t pursue gravity technology quickly and openly. This might seem counterintuitive (a con of not developing something), but it’s relevant given the user’s arguments. Keeping gravity research locked in black projects or dragging our feet due to fear could itself lead to dire outcomes:

• Lost Opportunity to Avert Crises: Our world faces some looming crises – climate change, resource depletion, risk of nuclear war – that current technology alone may not solve in time. Gravity tech, as we saw, could provide solutions: virtually unlimited clean energy and transport, access to space resources, etc. If we delay its development, we may blunder into a “nuclear holocaust” or ecological collapse that gravity-enabled progress might have prevented. The user suggests that failing to implement Einstein-level breakthroughs in time means “the numbers will be on how [things] don’t work”, i.e., the negatives will catch up to us. For instance, global warming might reach a tipping point. With gravity tech (like space-based solar or the ability to relocate industries off-planet), we could mitigate that much faster. Without it, we rely on slower, incremental tech shifts that might not beat the clock. In that sense, not pursuing gravity tech is its own risk – the risk of stagnation and continued destructive competition over shrinking resources.
• If Others Get There First: Another con of delay/secrecy is that someone else (maybe a rival nation or even an unexpected player like a private company or a well-funded terrorist group in a worst case) could achieve a breakthrough first and catch the world off-guard. If the US, for example, keeps everything secret and suddenly another country announces a gravity drive, it could cause panic or even temptation for a pre-emptive conflict. Transparency and international collaboration in research could prevent such surprises and build trust. Conversely, a scenario in which one side secretly develops gravity-propelled superweapons and the other side discovers it late could trigger exactly the war we want to avoid. This dynamic is akin to the nuclear arms race, but potentially faster – because if gravity tech is science-based and becomes known, many nations could develop it in parallel (again, depending on required resources). The race to tame gravity could either be a peaceful competition (like the race to the Moon, which, while between rivals, was more about prestige) or a dangerous arms race. Choosing openness could steer it to the former.
• Suppression of Human Potential: Lastly, keeping gravity breakthroughs secret or not investing in them is arguably a suppression of our species’ potential. The user’s passion is evident – they see joining an interstellar community and overcoming our current “scarcity ideologies” as a necessary evolution. If fear, conservatism, or vested interests (e.g., oil companies or military contractors who prefer the status quo) hold back gravity research, humanity could miss out on a “New World” that we might otherwise have “if we can take it”[51]. Imagine if, due to internal politics, we had shelved the space program indefinitely – we’d have no satellites, no GPS, no space station. Similarly, shelving gravity research means foregoing potentially civilization-saving innovations. There is a moral argument that knowledge itself should not be hidden. As one of Ning Li’s colleagues lamented, once she went dark, no one in the civilian world could learn from or build on her results[24]. That slows overall progress. In the worst case, if we don’t get gravity tech out in the open, and our civilization collapses (from war or environmental ruin), we might never get a second chance at it. That’s a rather dramatic con – the permanent loss of a pathway to the stars if we fall into a new dark age due to not using our best tools when we had them.

Conclusion: Balancing the Promise and Peril of Gravity Mastery

The pursuit of artificial gravity is a true double-edged sword for humanity. On one side, the benefits are staggering: ending transportation limits, opening the solar system and beyond, alleviating scarcity, and perhaps uniting us as a species. On the other side, the dangers are daunting: new superweapons, potential disasters, social upheaval, and the risk of abuse by the few at the expense of the many. How we navigate this challenge could determine the future course of civilization – whether we thrive in a new golden age or stumble into catastrophe.

A few key themes emerge from this deep exploration: urgency, openness, and responsibility. Urgency, because as the user eloquently argued, waiting too long or dragging our feet after reaching the “Einstein level” of understanding could be fatal – the world’s problems won’t wait, and meeting them with advanced solutions is crucial. We likely stand at or near that threshold now, with our knowledge of physics and the hints coming from both labs and possibly UFO encounters that gravity control is within reach. Openness, because the benefits of gravity tech only truly materialize if shared widely (global cheap transport, global prosperity) and many of the risks (monopolization, arms races) diminish if no single actor can hoard the capability. The story of Ning Li showed how secrecy can bury promising science; by contrast, open collaboration (perhaps an international “Gravity Project”) could accelerate progress while building mutual trust. And finally, responsibility, because even a world of freely available gravity tech could go wrong if humans don’t grow wiser in parallel. We must actively develop ethical frameworks, treaties, and safeguards now, anticipating what gravity control could do, much as visionaries like Einstein and Oppenheimer did when they grappled with nuclear ethics.

It’s often said that technology makes a good servant but a bad master. Taming gravity will test that adage to the extreme. It truly offers “a new world, if you can take it”[51] – the “taking” here means having the courage to grasp the opportunity, and the wisdom to not abuse it. In practical terms, that could mean pursuing aggressive research into gravitational science (from superconductors and metamaterials to quantum gravity theory) under civilian oversight and with international cooperation. It means planning conversion programs for industries and workers that will be displaced, so the transition is as smooth as possible (indeed, as the user believes, that transition pain will be far less than the pain of ecological or nuclear collapse that might occur if we don’t change course). It also means a new mindset of abundance and unity must be fostered: if gravity gives us the stars and ends material scarcity, our old instincts rooted in fear and greed should give way to collaboration and exploration.

In the end, the pros of artificial gravity can far outweigh the cons – but only if handled correctly. The same power to lift humanity up (literally and figuratively) could, unchecked, pull us down into disaster. The choice is ours, and the time to make that choice is now, as we stand on the verge of breakthroughs. As one gravity researcher from the 1950s optimistically said, “I think we could do the job… if enough trained scientific brainpower simultaneously began working towards a solution”[14]. Today, we have more brainpower and better tools (AI, advanced labs) than ever. It’s time to use them and take humanity to the next level – but we must also evolve our compassion and cooperation to match our genius. Gravity, the force that has held us all our lives, may soon become something we can shape. In doing so, we must ensure it shapes a better destiny for all of us, not just a privileged few. The promise of meeting our interstellar neighbors and securing a peaceful, thriving future on a healed Earth is there – “a new world” awaits, if we can take it.

Sources:

• Huntsville Business Journal – Noah Logan, “Uncovering the mystery of Huntsville’s brilliant anti-gravity scientist”, July 30, 2023[17][6]. (Background on Dr. Ning Li’s research claims and the transformative potential of “taming gravity” for transport and energy.)
• Wikipedia – Ning Li (physicist)[15][18]. (Summary of Ning Li’s gravitomagnetic superconducting theory and the DoD grant, with no published results.)
• The War Zone – Brett Tingley, “The Truth Is the Military Has Been Researching ‘Anti-Gravity’ for Nearly 70 Years”, Dec 2019[42][41]. (Extensive historical overview of U.S. gravity research, noting 60+ years of peer-reviewed studies and recent Navy “UFO” patents rooted in that research.)
• Alternative Propulsion Engineering Conference (APEC 2021) – Presentation by Dr. Jack Sarfatti[11][10]. (Discussion of low-power warp drive using gravitational metamaterials, explaining Tic Tac UAP performance via controlled space contraction/expansion.)
• Medium – Felicity Harley, “Jack Sarfatti’s Star Fleet Academy Comes to Life”, Aug 9, 2025[12][9]. (Q&A with Sarfatti describing how UAPs exploit negative mass effects to achieve warp-like travel, shrinking space ahead and stretching it behind.)
• Physics Stack Exchange – Answer by John Rennie, “Why does the Alcubierre drive get roasted by Hawking radiation?”[48][52]. (Explains that a superluminal warp drive would create horizons with intense radiation, likely fatal to occupants, and an unstable geometry that would destroy the drive.)
• The War Zone – Brett Tingley, “Emails Show Navy’s ‘UFO’ Patents Went Through Significant Internal Review”, 2020[38][46]. (Details on Salvatore Pais’ inertial mass reduction device patent and its claims of generating gravity control via resonant cavities; internal Navy communications cited competitive reasons.)
• org – Steven Greer, “Unacknowledged” (2017)[7]. (Testimony of Philip Corso Jr., recounting an ET encounter where the being offered “a new world, if you can take it,” highlighting the paradigm shift offered by alien technology if humanity is ready.)
• The War Zone – Brett Tingley, “The Legendary Aircraft People Think America Operates in Secret” (Sandboxx, 2021)[53]. (References to Lawrence D. Bell’s belief in gravity cancellation and other 1950s anti-gravity research anecdotes from Ansel Talbert’s articles.)

Links:

• [1] [2] [3] [4] [13] [14] [27] [28] [29] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [53] The Truth Is The Military Has Been Researching “Anti-Gravity” For Nearly 70 Years
• [5] [6] [17] [19] [20] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] Uncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist – Huntsville Business Journal
• [7] [8] [51] Full text of “Unacknowledged; An Expose Of The World’s Greatest Secret”
• [9] [12] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] JACK SARFATTI’S STAR FLEET ACADEMY COMES TO LIFE — | by Felicity Harley | Predict | Aug, 2025 | Medium
• [10] [11] APEC 9/11: Jack Sarfatti’s UAP Warp Drive & Tic Tac Tech – Alternative Propulsion Engineering Conference
• [15] [16] [18] [21] Ning Li (physicist) – Wikipedia
• [38] [40] US Navy granted patent for “inertial mass reduction device” using …
• [39] [46] Eigenbros ep 39 – UFO Technology Patents (Salvatore Cezar Pais)
• [47] [48] [49] [50] [52] Why does the alcubierre drive get roasted by hawking radiation? – Physics Stack Exchange

Please follow and like us: