The article discusses the credibility of UFO sightings and reports, suggesting that the Pentagon could have established a system to limit sources or highlight more reliable reports for review. It suggests that the credibility of a report could be determined by the source’s aviation experience, such as whether they are a licensed aviator, have air force experience, or work in aviation-related roles like air traffic control or radar engineering. Multiple witnesses to the same event could also add credibility.
However, the article questions this presumption, arguing that involvement in aviation doesn’t necessarily make someone an infallible witness. It points out that the evidence from pilot camera recordings has not withstood in-depth analysis. The article also highlights inconsistencies in reports, such as claims of incredible maneuverability that suggest the UFOs could be atmospheric phenomena rather than alien ships.
The article ends by wondering why, if these UFOs are indeed alien ships, the aliens do not simply announce themselves. It suggests that while pilots and air traffic controllers can verify the presence of an object on radar, they may not be able to accurately analyze what the object is.
Key Takeaways:
- The credibility of UFO sightings could be improved by establishing a system that filters or flags reports based on the background and qualifications of the reporter, such as whether they are a licensed aviator or have air force experience.
- While being involved in aviation might lend some credibility to a UFO witness, it does not make them infallible, and evidence from pilots’ camera recordings has not held up under scrutiny.
- Some of the characteristics attributed to UFOs, such as their incredible maneuverability, could actually argue against them being alien ships and suggest they are more likely atmospheric phenomena.
“We start off here with a presumption – that in order to be credible, the person observing must be a licensed aviator, involved with air flight in some capacity, or even better, in the air force. I don’t know exactly where that metric came from, but flying or being involved in it does not make a person an infallible witness.”
More details: here
Leave a Reply